Generative AI can support idea organization, concept explanation, and language checks. Acceptable use varies by university, journal, course, and type of work.
Service boundary: We do not prepare a thesis, article, assignment, project, or exam submission on behalf of a student or client. Support is limited to consulting and feedback that help researchers plan, learn methods, and improve their own draft.
Purpose of This Guide
The goal is not to conceal AI use but to document permitted use in a limited, verifiable, and transparent way.
Practical Working Steps
- Read the current institutional or journal policy.
- Define the limited purpose of the tool in advance.
- Do not upload personal data, participant information, or unpublished findings.
- Verify every fact, reference, and calculation.
- Disclose the tool, purpose, date, and verification process when required.
Quality Checklist
- The final argument and interpretation belong to the researcher.
- AI-suggested sources were read and verified.
- The required disclosure was included.
- Working notes and versions were retained.
Approaches to Avoid
- Presenting AI output as human-authored.
- Attempting to bypass detection systems.
- Uploading confidential or personal data to third-party tools.
Scope of Consulting
Consulting may explain a brief or institutional guide, help create a work plan, teach method alternatives, and provide reasoned feedback on the researcher’s own draft. It does not produce a new academic submission; data, sources, analytical decisions, interpretations, and the final text remain the researcher’s responsibility.
Frequently Asked Questions
Do you provide AI-detection bypass?
No. No method or service intended to mislead detection systems is provided.
How should AI use be disclosed?
Follow the institution’s format and explain the tool, purpose, scope, and verification process.
