AI can support concept explanation, study planning, and language checks. Submitting generated text as one’s own does not remove academic responsibility.
Service boundary: We do not prepare a thesis, article, assignment, project, or exam submission on behalf of a student or client. Support is limited to consulting and feedback that help researchers plan, learn methods, and improve their own draft.
Purpose of This Guide
The goal is to preserve the student’s own thinking and writing while using AI as a limited, verifiable, and transparent learning tool.
Practical Working Steps
- Read the course and institutional AI policy.
- Write down the permitted purpose before using the tool.
- Use it to explain concepts or question your own draft rather than generate an answer.
- Verify every claim, calculation, and reference independently.
- Disclose the tool, date, purpose, and method when required.
Quality Checklist
- The central idea, analysis, and final text belong to the student.
- No personal or confidential data was shared.
- Sources were read and verified by the student.
- The student can explain every submitted section.
Approaches to Avoid
- Generating the entire assignment and submitting it unchanged.
- Using fabricated or unread references.
- Concealing use or attempting to bypass detection.
Scope of Consulting
Consulting may explain a brief or institutional guide, help create a work plan, teach method alternatives, and provide reasoned feedback on the researcher’s own draft. It does not produce a new academic submission; data, sources, analytical decisions, interpretations, and the final text remain the researcher’s responsibility.
Frequently Asked Questions
Do you provide AI-generated assignments?
No. No assignment is produced on behalf of a student; ethical-use planning and teaching-focused feedback on the student’s own draft may be provided.
Must every use of AI be disclosed?
The exact rule depends on your institution. Follow the current course or institutional policy.
